Leviathan Fetus Ad Campaign To Take on Planned Parenthood

What happens when 53 million fetuses gather into one place? Fetus Leviathan...or was that Planned Parenthood's worst nightmare?

The National Right to Life has until recently only been known for two things: 1. Their staunch defense of the pro-life movement, and 2. A really crappy website. All that is about to change as they unleash a full frontal media assault on Planned Parenthood with…Fetus Leviathan! (or Baby Leviathan depending on your perspective). For years organizations like March for Life have drawn huge crowds, but scant media attention. With “Baby Leviathan”, The National Right to Life promises to give birth to a commercial that will be covered around the water cooler for a week.

In short, the discarded fetuses (or corpses?) of millions of babies are resurrected into a giant uber-fetus that springs forth from the ocean—Mother Earth—to confront Planned Parenthood operatives. Aspects of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol are also undeniable.

NRL President Carol Tobias weighs in:

53 million abortions since 1973. That’s astounding. Think of the national debt and stack up those dollar bills. Now think of four decades of abortions, and stack up those babies. Besides not being as stack-friendly as currency, it’s a disturbing visual, isn’t it? Well, we think the American people will see it that way too. We’re going to shift the debate with this ad buy, I promise.

Asked for a response, Planned Parenthood’s President, Cecile Richards, was defiant:

Guess what? To paraphrase Thomas Hobbes: “Life is nasty, brutish, and short—especially if you’re an unwanted fetus. Hobbes didn’t say that last bit…but the point is, the pro-life movement is wrong. Dead wrong (pardon the pun, I can’t help myself). There hasn’t been a genocide of 53 million people since 1973; Planned Parenthood has been a small part of saving the planet from 53 million carbon-dioxide emitters, rising crime, and abject poverty. The color of abortion is green. The right just doesn’t know it yet.

For many years the right has held prayer vigils outside abortion clinics. While prayer can be a powerful tool, in this instance it seems to have succeeded in…congregating a lot of really quiet people on really busy city sidewalks (interesting to look at, but not an effective deterrent to abortion for the less religious among us). Hopefully, this new ad campaign is a sign from God that they need to play hard ball.

Planned Parenhood has proven it can bring a coat hanger to a knife fight and win. But will they prevail (or partial-birth prevail?) against an all star marketing firm? Only time— perhaps a trimester—will tell.

This post was saved from a back alley dumpster filled with discarded satire, a beautiful bit of prose no one wanted. Saved by a good (but bizarre) doctor.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Leviathan Fetus Ad Campaign To Take on Planned Parenthood

  1. Good Doctor,

    Are you kidding? One need only observe the societal, and organizational, landscape to learn that Planned Parenthood is a health organization, for which (as the name implies) “Planned” parenthood is a good idea. Just because you, and whomever else you cite, might choose to make a woman’s rights and her procreative choices into public matters; women, like I, need no longer entreat you for your permission. Choice and Pro-Life are misanthropically invented euphemisms invented to undo and rewrite the history of “Suffrage.”

    So there, Doctor!

    Politely yours,

    Silence

    • Silence,

      I’m always up for a good jousting match. I hope you continue reading! My point wasn’t whether the “Sovereign” should allow abortions (I’ll save that for another day), but whether or not life begins at conception. IF it does, that reframes the debate. New technologies have actually annoyed groups sympathetic to Planned Parenthood http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1P1wSbMvCQ because it’s impossible to experience them without confronting such questions in ways not possible in years past.

      Your rights typically end where they begin infringing upon another’s. Again, IF life begins at conception, that would seem to indicate that rules and regulations pertaining to abortion do not infringe upon a woman’s rights, but are in fact safeguarding human rights.

      I’m not questioning a set of laws. I’m questioning a premise. Is a zygote merely a collection of cells, or is it a human at the first stage of development? And IF it is a human, don’t we have an obligation to protect those least able to protect themselves?

      If this blog is an online water cooler, my goal has already been accomplished. Again, thanks for the post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s